Zur Rolle der Freiheit in Kants (Moral-)Philosophie

dc.contributor.authorGeismann, Georg
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-23T09:34:55Z
dc.date.available2024-04-23T09:34:55Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractThe focus of this paper is on the concepts of practical and transcendental freedom, their relation to each other, and their role in Kant’s (moral) philosophy. It is argued that there is in this regard neither an inconsistency or contradiction between the Dialectic and the Canon of the first Critique nor a break between the first and the second Critique. The Canon’s claim that we cognize practical freedom through experience must by no means be understood as implying that Kant held a “naturalized” concept of freedom. The paper also reveals the preparatory role of the first Critique with respect to the moral philosophy that Kant, beginning in the Groundwork, presented in the following years.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10062/98293
dc.language.isode
dc.relation.ispartofKant-Studien, 111 (2020) 386-422
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectpractical and transcendental freedom
dc.subjectspeculative and practical use of reason
dc.subjectcausality of nature and of reason
dc.subjectdeduction of the fundamental law of pure practical reason
dc.subjectdeduction of transcendental freedom
dc.titleZur Rolle der Freiheit in Kants (Moral-)Philosophie
dc.typeArticle

Failid

Originaal pakett

Nüüd näidatakse 1 - 1 1
Laen...
Pisipilt
Nimi:
zur_Rolle_der_Freiheit.pdf
Suurus:
446.74 KB
Formaat:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Kollektsioonid